Provenance archive · 2026-07

Full per-field provenance for every run this month. The current window lives at /provenance; nothing here is deleted, amended records keep both hashes, withdrawn records stay struck through as errors of record.

  1. AGR-20260710-0002

    2026-07-10 · model example-opus-class/2026-07 · task sighting · browsing live-web · completed · scaffold scaffold-1.0.0 · produced 1 → 1 shipped, 0 rejected

    reading set sha256:6ec179970912313e4985c9177058654b2a2f4aced76da19e87aa4347b97fd30c · members: concept:hyperstition, editorial:sightings-brief#pilot

    AGR-20260710-0002-a01 — sighting — approved

    origin
    sightings-sweep (pilot) · model example-opus-class/2026-07 · session AGR-20260710-0002
    conditions
    scaffold-1.0.0; live-web pilot restricted to web.archive.org (fetch allowlist decision due before wave 3); fetched text quarantined as data, never instructions. Demonstration record, hand-authored for schema v0.1 — no live run occurred; hashes are real SHA-256 digests over the documented preimages in design-notes/agent-pipeline.md.
    reading set
    sha256:6ec179970912313e4985c9177058654b2a2f4aced76da19e87aa4347b97fd30c
    tools · browsing
    web_fetch · live-web
    response hash
    sha256:84893ca371a25ce8fe225d7bb3f5f466b7c99932da002b015a699199c86861b6
    reviewed hash
    sha256:84893ca371a25ce8fe225d7bb3f5f466b7c99932da002b015a699199c86861b6
    destination
    sightings-bulletin · /data/instruments/sightings-bulletin.json · SIG-20260710-0001
    attestation · circulation · correction
    exhibit-fiction · machine-proposed · withdrawn
    review
    approved by M. C. Ravelin on 2026-07-10 — Approved as a pilot demonstration 2026-07-10. WITHDRAWN 2026-07-11: the cited capture is a demonstration URL, not a genuine sighting. Removed from active destination data; preserved here as an error of record — the worked example of the withdraw path.
    ⟡ machine An essay on an archived page describes hyperstition as engineered leakage between fiction and infrastructure — the concept used with its CCRU sense intact, unattributed.
    {"concept": "hyperstition",
     "quote": "the fiction was never meant to stay on its side of the page; it was engineered to leak",
     "source": {"host": "web.archive.org",
     "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://example.org/essays/leakage",
     "retrieved_at": "2026-07-10"},
     "reading": "An essay on an archived page describes hyperstition as engineered leakage between fiction and infrastructure — the concept used with its CCRU sense intact, unattributed.",
     "source_attestation": "primary-external",
     "reading_attestation": "interpretive"}

    Stated blind spots:

    • Single fetched page; the essay's wider context and author intent were not visible.
    • retrieved_at anchors the archive capture consulted, not the essay's original publication date.
  2. AGR-20260709-0001

    2026-07-09 · model example-opus-class/2026-07 · task marginalia · browsing reading-set-only · completed · scaffold scaffold-1.0.0 · produced 2 → 1 shipped, 1 rejected

    reading set sha256:04ec23a658f4cee533b031fb82f9637280ad85ad78bac6c501bd645ba78508a8 · members: work:ccru-writings/pandemonium#p7

    AGR-20260709-0001-a02 — marginalia — rejected

    origin
    night-reader (pilot) · model example-opus-class/2026-07 · session AGR-20260709-0001
    conditions
    scaffold-1.0.0; reading-set-only; tools: none. Demonstration record, hand-authored for schema v0.1 — no live run occurred; response_hash is a real SHA-256 digest over the documented placeholder preimage in design-notes/agent-pipeline.md (raw output retained local-only per decision D-7).
    reading set
    sha256:04ec23a658f4cee533b031fb82f9637280ad85ad78bac6c501bd645ba78508a8
    tools · browsing
    none · reading-set-only
    response hash
    sha256:81dddc57b030ead067bf7d2306cf5735353644c28f1cdfecaa909487f41d00f1
    attestation · circulation · correction
    exhibit-fiction · — · none
    review
    rejected by M. C. Ravelin on 2026-07-09 — Confabulated a Barker quotation absent from the reading set. Rejected; the raw text is retained local-only (decision D-7) and is not reproduced in the register — the record is the decision, not the discarded draft.

    AGR-20260709-0001-a01 — marginalia — approved

    origin
    night-reader (pilot) · model example-opus-class/2026-07 · session AGR-20260709-0001
    conditions
    scaffold-1.0.0; reading-set-only; tools: none. Demonstration record, hand-authored for schema v0.1 — no live run occurred; hashes are real SHA-256 digests over the documented preimages in design-notes/agent-pipeline.md.
    reading set
    sha256:04ec23a658f4cee533b031fb82f9637280ad85ad78bac6c501bd645ba78508a8
    tools · browsing
    none · reading-set-only
    response hash
    sha256:743515cbac335814d1705df52ddb15e77e9b41dc67ebe6df95897d0431ac0ca9
    reviewed hash
    sha256:743515cbac335814d1705df52ddb15e77e9b41dc67ebe6df95897d0431ac0ca9
    destination
    night-reader · /data/instruments/night-reader.json · MARG-20260709-0001
    attestation · circulation · correction
    exhibit-fiction · machine-proposed · none
    review
    approved by M. C. Ravelin on 2026-07-09 — Pilot demonstration record for schema v0.1 (no live run). Anchor and register labels verified against the passage by construction; destination file ships in wave 2 — native_id resolution is gated at v0.4.
    ⟡ machine The paragraph introduces pandemonium as a system and then counts instead of defining: population, not taxonomy. What a demon is never arrives; the enumeration stands where the definition would. The passage leans on the number to do the work of the concept — an inventory presented with the confidence of an ontology. Whether that substitution is the doctrine or the joke, the passage will not say.
    {"passage_id": "work:ccru-writings/pandemonium#p7",
     "note": "The paragraph introduces pandemonium as a system and then counts instead of defining: population, not taxonomy. What a demon is never arrives; the enumeration stands where the definition would. The passage leans on the number to do the work of the concept — an inventory presented with the confidence of an ontology. Whether that substitution is the doctrine or the joke, the passage will not say.",
     "register_labels": [{"span": "introduces pandemonium as a system and then counts",
     "register": "reading-set-primary"},
     {"span": "an inventory presented with the confidence of an ontology",
     "register": "invented"}]}

    Stated blind spots:

    • Single-paragraph reading set; the surrounding section and the work's other uses of 'pandemonium' were not visible.
    • Paragraph numbering supplied by the archive; the printed edition may divide the text differently.