Record page
Robin Mackay-#Accelerate_ The Accelerationist Reader
Mackay's anthology introduction maps accelerationism as a contested editorial field, separating lineages and political stakes that raw archive fragments often blur together.
Access note
Public page exposes metadata and a short excerpt only. Full text remains in the internal canonical corpus.
Core idea
Mackay presents accelerationism as a disputed inheritance assembled from Marx, cybernetics, science fiction, nihilism, and political strategy.
The argument works by splitting apart tendencies that later readers often collapse together: abstraction is not identical to emancipation, and technological intensification is not identical to revolutionary politics.
The stakes are editorial and intellectual. Without this sorting work, accelerationism hardens into a single myth instead of a field of incompatible claims.
Representative extracts
Definition · extracted text
Accelerationism is a political heresy: the insistence that the only radical political response to capitalism is not to protest, disrupt, or critique, nor to await its demise at the hands of its own contradictions, but to accelerate its uprooting, alienating, decoding, abstractive tendencies.
Why this matters: Here Mackay sets the anthology's working definition by exclusion, marking accelerationism off from protest, critique, and passive waiting before any positive program enters the field.
Stakes · extracted text
At the basis of all accelerationist thought lies the assertion that the crimes, contradictions and absurdities of capitalism have to be countered with a politically and theoretically progressive attitude towards its constituent elements.
Why this matters: This line names the minimal commitment every variant shares, which licenses Mackay's treatment of otherwise incompatible positions as one contested field rather than separate movements.
History · extracted text
Catastrophe is the past coming apart. Anastrophe is the future coming together.
Why this matters: The aphorism compresses the cybernetic strand's temporal inversion into a slogan, giving Mackay a fixed historical reference point against which later accelerationisms can be measured.
Style · extracted text
Ballard echoes Firestone's call for a merging of artistic and technological modes, advocating the role of science fiction not only as 'the only possible realism in an increasingly artificialized society', but as an ingredient in its acceleration.
Why this matters: The Ballard example shows the lineage running through aesthetics as well as theory: science fiction enters Mackay's canon as an active accelerant, not as illustrative background culture.
Afterlife · extracted text
today's accelerationisms can be seen as a refinement and rethinking of them through the prism of the decades that spanned the end of the twentieth century and the birth of the twenty-first.
Why this matters: The plural 'accelerationisms' carries the editorial argument in one word: the present inherits these texts as revision rather than repetition, keeping the field from hardening into a single myth.
Provenance
Canonical introduction copied from the curated introductions folder assembled from land-ccru-archive.tar.gz.
Appears in sections
Accelerationism Branches and Debates Primary section
Left, right, unconditional, and popularized accelerationisms sorted into a cleaner research map.
Capital, Meltdown, and Cybernetic Modernity Also in
Capitalist abstraction, deterritorialization, cybernetics, and the archive's account of runaway modernity.
Virtual Futures and Para-Academia Also in
Events, workshops, and off-campus method as the CCRU moved from campus structure toward para-academic circulation.